BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Law School: Events - ECPv6.15.20//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Law School: Events
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Australia/Sydney
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
TZNAME:AEST
DTSTART:20210403T160000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
TZNAME:AEDT
DTSTART:20211002T160000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
TZNAME:AEST
DTSTART:20220402T160000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
TZNAME:AEDT
DTSTART:20221001T160000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
TZNAME:AEST
DTSTART:20230401T160000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
TZNAME:AEDT
DTSTART:20230930T160000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
TZNAME:AEST
DTSTART:20240406T160000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
TZNAME:AEDT
DTSTART:20241005T160000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+1100
TZOFFSETTO:+1000
TZNAME:AEST
DTSTART:20250405T160000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+1000
TZOFFSETTO:+1100
TZNAME:AEDT
DTSTART:20251004T160000
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240911T120000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240911T130000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235224Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20241118T230327Z
UID:1533-1726056000-1726059600@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Taking Power Seriously in Constitutional Law: A Materialist Approach to Constitutional Law\, Executive Power\, and the British State
DESCRIPTION:#N/A
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-taking-power-seriously-in-constitutional-law-a-materialist-approach-to-constitutional-law-executive-power-and-the-british-state/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240829T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240829T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235232Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010752Z
UID:1539-1724954400-1724959800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: 'The Little Commonweale of my poore thoughts': nature\, ownership\, Cosmography\, and the origins of the climate crisis in Richard Zouche\, 1613-63
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: ‘The Little Commonweale of my poore thoughts’: nature\, ownership\, Cosmography\, and the origins of the climate crisis in Richard Zouche\, 1613-63\nIn-person event \nThis seminar examines Richard Zouche’s legal thought on ‘nature’ at some of the earliest origins of the climate crisis and the formation of international law. Zouche is usually remembered as the ‘father’ of international legal positivism for his 1656 treatise An Exposition of the Fecial Law and Procedure\, or of Law between Nations where he influentially introduced the term ‘jus inter gentes’ or law between peoples as the basis for his juridical system. In this work\, Zouche deals extensively with questions of ownership in war and peace. He describes a tripartite right for princes and peoples as ‘Plenary’\, ‘Hereditary’ or ‘merely Usufructuary’ rights both to holding power and property. He also deals with questions of sea jurisdiction and appropriation by occupation\, which he expanded on in his posthumous treatise on the Admiralty courts. \nMost significantly\, Zouche solidifies two major tenets of legal argumentation that provided the early architecture for claims and extraction that formed the early climate crisis. First was the ‘jus inter gentes’ formulation that allowed for international law to be developed by consent between princes and peoples\, referable to Augustinian concord but not bound by it or the law of nature. Second\, Zouche’s modernisation of the disputation format gave ‘both sides’ of each of these legal questions\, both obscuring Zouche’s own views and giving princes and lawyers a handbook with the argumentative structures for claiming and resisting legal disputes around ownership\, showing the vital importance of these legal questions in the early history of international law. But it is in Zouche’s juvenile cosmographical poem ‘The Dove’ (1613) that an early vision of the political economy of the world and the importance of sight and ordering — the main tools of positivism — were first announced through the circling of Noah’s dove. Zouche called this poem ‘the little Commonweale of my poore thoughts’. The Dove provides an early announcement of the foundational commitments that thread through Zouche’s major juridical works. Throughout these works\, Zouche’s engagement with nature and natural resources move quickly to questions of ownership and right\, revealing the function of law to connect early forms of extraction\, capitalism and empire. \nAbout the speaker\nMartin Clark is a lecturer at La Trobe Law School. His research focuses on the history of legal thought and international and public law. His work has been published in the Modern Law Review\, the British Yearbook of International Law\, the Leiden Journal of International Law and the Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly\, and he is finishing a book (with Dr Yoriko Otomo) on law and commodities\, Eating the World: A Global History of Law and Commodities (Counterpress). He was awarded his PhD in Law from the London School of Economics and Political Science in May 2020 for a thesis on the history of the ideas of ‘domestic’ and ‘international’ in British legal thought. At LSE he was a Judge Rosalyn Higgins Scholar and Modern Law Review Scholar (2018 and 2019). \nHe is an Editor at the London Review of International Law and Web Assistant at the Modern Law Review. Prior to joining La Trobe he was a Modern Law Review Postdoctoral Fellow\, a Visiting Fellow at the Institute for International Law and the Humanities at Melbourne Law School\, a Lecturer at UTAS Law\, where he taught contract and legal theory\, and a JD Teaching Fellow at Melbourne Law School\, where he taught contract \nThursday 29 August 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-the-little-commonweale-of-my-poore-thoughts-nature-ownership-cosmography-and-the-origins-of-the-climate-crisis-in-richard-zouche-1613-63/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240731T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240731T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235249Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010754Z
UID:1546-1722448800-1722454200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:Julius Stone Address: Law\, Philosophy\, and the Susceptible Skins of Living Beings
DESCRIPTION:Julius Stone Address: Law\, Philosophy\, and the Susceptible Skins of Living Beings\nIn-person event\n  \nCatherine the Great (apparently) wrote to the French philosopher Diderot something along the lines of: “You philosophers are fortunate. You write on paper\, and paper is patient. Unfortunate emperor that I am\, I write on the susceptible skins of living beings.” Catherine expressed\, I think\, an important insight\, that is true of the law as well: the law writes on the susceptible skins of living beings. \nThis doesn’t mean\, of course\, that we should not philosophize about the law\, or that we should not take advantage of the benefits of having patient paper to write on. But as we do so\, we should philosophize about the law all the time fully realizing that the law itself does not write on patient paper\, but on the susceptible skins of living beings. This has important implications to how we should – and how we should not – do philosophy of law. This talk elaborates on these implications – both in general\, and using more specific examples. \nAbout the speaker\nProfessor David Enoch \nDavid Enoch is The Professor of the Philosophy of Law at Oxford\, and the Rodney Blackman Chair in the Philosophy of Law at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. He works primarily in moral\, political\, and legal philosophy. \nDavid studies law and philosophy at Tel Aviv University\, and then got his PhD in philosophy at NYU (2003). He has published a book defending moral realism (Taking Morality Seriously\, OUP 2011)\, and many papers mostly in moral\, political\, and legal philosophy. \n  \nWednesday 31 July\, 2024\nTime: 6-7.30pm \nVenue: Auditorium 104/105\, Michael Spence Building (F23)\, City Road\, University of Sydney\, Camperdown campus \n  \nThis event is hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. \nThe Julius Stone Address is generously sponsored by the Educational Heritage Foundation. It is named to commemorate the life and work of Professor Julius Stone\, Australia’s foremost legal philosopher and for many years Challis Professor of International Law and Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/julius-stone-address-law-philosophy-and-the-susceptible-skins-of-living-beings/
LOCATION:Auditorium 104/105\, Michael Spence Building (F23)
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240724T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240724T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235246Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010750Z
UID:1543-1721844000-1721849400@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Natural Law to Natural Rights to Human Rights
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Natural Law to Natural Rights to Human Rights\nIn-person event \n**Please note this event date has been moved to one day earlier than originally advertised.** \nNatural law and natural rights are frequently discussed as if they are tightly connected\, and human rights are presented as natural rights in a new label. But the relationship between all three is complicated and in tension. Natural law consists of objective legal principles and rules dictating the right course of action: do good and avoid evil\, do not murder or steal\, honor contracts\, and other binding proscriptions and prescriptions. Natural rights\, in contrast\, are innate subjective rights individuals hold against government and others. This is about individual powers\, entitlements\, and areas of protection from infringement by others: a right to possess property\, to defend one’s life\, to exercise free speech\, to choose one’s religion\, to choose employment and spouses\, and so forth. \nThomas Hobbes drew a clear distinction between the two: “RIGHT consisteth in liberty to do\, or to forbear: whereas LAW\, determineth\, and bindeth to one of them: so that law\, and right\, differ as much\, as obligation and liberty.” Or as John Locke put it\, “for right [jus] consists in the fact that we have a free use of something\, but law [lex] is that which either commands or forbids some action.” A tension arises because natural rights promote freedom while natural law compels conformity. Natural rights and human rights appear obviously connected\, since both espouse rights that attach to humans universally. Yet tension exists because natural rights had expired over a century before “human rights” obtained recognition\, those who recognized human rights did not identify them with natural rights\, and the content of the human rights extend far beyond previously recognized natural rights. Natural law\, natural rights\, and human rights are linked yet distinct. \nAbout the speaker\nBrian Tamanaha is the John S. Lehmann University Professor at Washington University School of Law. A scholar of jurisprudence and law and society\, he has written eleven books\, which have collectively received 6 book awards\, and his work has been translated into a dozen languages. \nWednesday 24 July 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEST – NEW DATE\nVenue: Level 4\, Boardroom\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-natural-law-to-natural-rights-to-human-rights/
LOCATION:Board Room\, Level 4
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240620T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240620T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235305Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010751Z
UID:1552-1718906400-1718911800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Social Rights and Proportionality
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Social Rights and Proportionality\nIn-person event \nThis seminar outlines a model of proportionality analysis for the adjudication of positive constitutional economic and social rights [hereinafter: social rights]. Three distinctions are the basis of this model: (i) the distinction between empirical and normative aspects of the adjudication of social rights; (ii) between the level and mode of fulfilment of those rights; and (iii) between the competence of political authorities and courts to determine the appropriate level and mode of satisfaction. \nAbout the speaker\nCarlos Bernal is First Vice-President and Commissioner of the Inter-American Human Rights Commission. He is professor of law at the University of Dayton (Ohio\, USA) and Macquarie University (Sydney\, Australia). Between 2017 and 2020\, he was Justice at the Colombian Constitutional Court. His qualifications include a LL.B. from the University Externado of Colombia (Bogotá – Colombia) (1996)\, a S.J.D. from the University of Salamanca (Spain) (2001)\, and a M.A. (2008) and a Ph.D. in Philosophy (2011) from the University of Florida (U.S.A). \nProf. Bernal’s research focuses on constitutional rights’ interpretation\, comparative constitutional change\, human rights\, energy transition\, and general jurisprudence. \nThursday 20 June 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-social-rights-and-proportionality/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240618T140000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240618T150000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235304Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010754Z
UID:1551-1718719200-1718722800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Workshop: Positive Pluralism and its Limits
DESCRIPTION:JSI Workshop: Positive Pluralism and its Limits\nIn-person event \nThis project asks how freedom of religion should be construed when applied to religious insular communities whose way of life is often at odds with Western assumptions of a good life. I will argue for protection of distinctive religious communal identities as entities in and of themselves that are deserving of constitutional protection on the ground that they contribute to a thick pluralism. I propose a theory of pluralism that is premised on its positive value\, and not merely on what John Rawls calls the “fact of pluralism.” At the same time\, I argue that it is equally if not more important to ensure that members of such communities have a meaningful ability to exit from them. The project will spotlight several concrete impediments to the “right of exit” in one large insular religious community: the Hasidic community in New York. It will lay out not only how internal communal practices—including and most notably the lack of secular education—can hamper members’ ability to exit but also how the state\, via its family courts\, contribute to its curtailment. \nAbout the speaker \nZalman Rothschild is Assistant Professor of Law and Horn Family Distinguished Research Scholar in Law and Religion at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. Previously\, he was a Bigelow Fellow and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago Law School. His research focuses on the First Amendment\, anti-discrimination law\, and law and religion. \nBefore becoming a Bigelow Fellow\, Zalman served as a law clerk to Judge Jane Roth on the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and practiced law for several years as a litigation associate at Paul\, Weiss. During that time\, Zalman was recognized by The American Lawyer in its “Litigator of the Week” profile for winning a Fourth Amendment appeal and securing the reversal of all convictions of his client (2021) and received the “On the Rise—Top 40 Young Lawyer” award from the American Bar Association (2022). \nZalman holds a JD\, magna cum laude\, from Harvard Law School and a PhD in Religion from New York University. \n——————————— \nTuesday 18 June\, 2024\nTime: 2-3pm  \nVenue: Level 4\, Board Room\, New Law Building (F10) \nCPD Points: 1 \n———————————- \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-workshop-positive-pluralism-and-its-limits/
LOCATION:Board Room\, Level 4
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240606T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240606T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235317Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010747Z
UID:1554-1717696800-1717702200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: A republican case for regulatory juries
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: A republican case for regulatory juries\nIn-person event \nThe idea of administrative juries was proposed by David Arkush in 2013\, drawing on the republican revival in public-law theory. These proposed juries would make some key policy choices especially underlying delegated lawmaking in the US. The paper challenges some criticisms that have been made of his proposal. It also draws on aspects of the republican tradition not employed by Arkush to support such juries. Indeed\, the paper suggests that more extensive delegation could occur where juries are involved. Partly for that reason\, the wider term ‘regulatory juries’ is preferred. The paper argues that such juries may assist in democratising delegated legislation as well as the political system more generally. They could do so not only in the US but also\, at least\, in the UK and Australia. \nAbout the speaker\nEric Ghosh is an Associate Professor in the Law School at the University of New England\, where he has taught jurisprudence and administrative law. His research is in constitutional theory\, political philosophy and the history of political thought\, with a focus on the republican revival in legal scholarship. He is the author of articles published in journals including the History of Political Thought and Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. More recently\, he wrote Beyond the republican revival: Liberty as non-domination\, positive liberty\, and sortition (Hart\, 2020). \n\nThursday 6 June 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-a-republican-case-for-regulatory-juries/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240523T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240523T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235318Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010750Z
UID:1555-1716487200-1716492600@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: On Constitutional Review
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: On Constitutional Review\nIn-person event \nConstitutional review is a continental European instrument of checking the parliamentary legislation for its compliance with the constitution. This practice has a long history traced from ancient Greek democracy to the French and American Revolutions up to the 20th century culminating in Constitutional Courts. The Czechoslovakian experience of its Constitution of 1920 gives a unique perspective on the rule of law and the perennial questions of constitutional review: who should be the guardian of the Constitution? In its contemporary form\, this question has become whether the doctrine of the sovereignty of the parliament is a serious obstacle for a too strong (dominant) role of the judiciary the Large scale of competences of the Constitutional courts (except constitutional review). The talk concludes by discussing possible solutions without Constitutional Courts. \nAbout the speaker\nAlexander Bröstl is a Professor of Legal Philosophy in Slovakia. He was formerly a Judge on and later advisor to the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic\, as well as a member of the Judicial Council. His career has included positions at Fudan University in Shanghai\, and then Slovakian Consul in Beijing. Alexander next spent 18 years in Strasbourg as the Slovak member of the European Charter on Minority Languages. In addition\, he has been professor of law at the PJ Å afárik University and University of Trnava\, and held several high level administrative positions. \n  \nThursday 23 May 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-on-constitutional-review/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240509T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240509T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063402
CREATED:20240912T235331Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010746Z
UID:1558-1715277600-1715283000@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Well-tempered power: "˜A cultural achievement of universal significance'
DESCRIPTION:#N/A
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-well-tempered-power-a-cultural-achievement-of-universal-significance/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240415T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240415T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235347Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250306T033415Z
UID:1564-1713204000-1713209400@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Dominium in the Age of Neurotechnologies: Who Is the Subject of Neurorights?
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar | Dominium in the Age of Neurotechnologies: Who Is the Subject of Neurorights?In-person event\n\nMany scholars expressed concerns about how potential misuse of neurotechnologies may threaten some basic rights such as right to privacy\, freedom of thought\, freedom from self-incrimination\, right to fair trial\, prohibition of discrimination\, etc. In order to ensure an effective protection against these potential threats concrete proposals\, such as reconceptualizing already existing rights or creating new rights\, are set forth. Nevertheless\, the academic debate on how to effectively protect the domain of cognitive liberty from potential violations is conducted without an open discussion on who should be the subject of neurorights. This is not surprising at the first glance\, for there is a quasi-unanimity on the content of the notion of “human” as the subject of human rights. The proposed categories of neurorights\, especially that of cognitive liberty do not contradict the existing human rights concept in this respect.\n\nThe recently flourishing scholarship on the history of human rights\, however\, offers a critical study of the abstract concept of human as the subject of human rights. The present paper\, in line with this scholarship\, attempts to introduce a historiographic perspective to the debate on neurorights by asking whether the concept of human as maintained in the theory of human rights is suitable for defining a subject of rights in the age of neurotechnologies. First\, the paper offers a historical account on how the concept of human was formed theoretically at the dawn of modernity. Secondly it explains the concept of dominium from a historical perspective and links it to the modern theory of human rights. Finally\, it discusses whether neurotechnologies present a challenge to the theoretical constellation around the subject of human rights originating from the notion of dominium.\nAbout the speaker:\nOzan Erözden holds a PhD in public law from the University of Istanbul (1996). Before joining Kadir Has University Faculty of Law he held permanent lecturer positions at Istanbul University Law Faculty\, Yıldız Technical University\, Department of Political Science and International Relations and at MEF University Law Faculty. Between 1998 and 2001 he worked as human rights observer within the OSCE mission to Croatia. Between March 2006 and September 2007 he conducted research at the International Criminal Law Institute of Cologne University as an Alexander von Humboldt fellow.\n\nHe participated in two different international scientific projects\, namely Blue-Bird (funded by UNDP and coordinated by Central European University) and JURISTAS (funded by European Commission under the 6th Framework Programme)\, as well as a national one (TÃœBÄ°TAK 1001). Erözden’s published works relate mainly to theory of state\, theories of nationalism\, human rights\, transitional justice and philosophy of law. His current area of research is the interaction between neuroscience and legal theory.\n\n \nMonday 15 April 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus\n\nCPD Points: 1.5\n\nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-dominium-in-the-age-of-neurotechnologies-who-is-the-subject-of-neurorights/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240307T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20240307T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235401Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250306T033446Z
UID:1568-1709834400-1709839800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | European Émigré Legal Scholars in Australian Law Schools: Julius Stone's Circle
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar | European Émigré Legal Scholars in Australian Law Schools: Julius Stone’s CircleIn-person event\n\nDuring and immediately after World War II\, some Australian law schools had the opportunity to rescue European émigré legal scholars fleeing persecution and fascism. Overwhelmingly\, Australian universities did not become shelters for refugee intellectuals\, despite the extraordinary efforts of some individuals and agencies supporting them. Nevertheless\, some émigré legal scholars did come to Australia\, some gained positions in Australian universities\, and they prompted a significant transformation in legal pedagogy and research.\n\nMark Lunney has remarked that the influence of European émigré scholars on Australian law is a “forgotten history”.[1] Part of a larger collaborative project that aims to retrieve that history\, this paper details the contributions of émigré scholars in the Department of International Law and Jurisprudence at the University of Sydney under Julius Stone’s leadership. Building upon the existing scholarship on Stone’s influence in Australia\, this paper examines other individuals within Stone’s circle\, including Ilmar Tammelo\, Otto Bondy and Charles Alexandrowicz. It also explores the role of the Australian Society of Legal Philosophy\, which was established to offer sanctuary and intellectual camaraderie for émigré legal scholars.\n\nDrawing upon archival records\, unpublished sources and interviews with former students of the Department\, the paper offers a case study of the network of jurists based at the University of Sydney in order to investigate the impact of migration on Australian legal institutions\, education and practice.\n\nThe project\, and perhaps also this paper\, will introduce a wider cohort of characters that have influenced the development of Australian jurisprudence and legal education. In particular\, it will allow for a richer understanding the aftermath of the Second World War as a key moment of transformation in the legal institutions and cultures in Australia.\n\n[1] See Mark Lunney ‘Legal Emigres and the Development of Australian Tort Law’ 36(2) Melbourne University Law Review 494\, 495.\nAbout the speaker:\nKatherine Biber is a legal scholar\, historian and criminologist\, and Professor of Law at the University of Technology Sydney\, where she specialises in the law of evidence. She is author of In Crime’s Archive: The Cultural Afterlife of Evidence (Routledge\, 2019) and Captive Images: Race\, Crime\, Photography (Routledge\, 2004). Her recent co-edited collections include Law’s Documents (with Trish Luker and Priya Vaughan\, Routledge 2022) and Evidence and the Archive (with Trish Luker\, Routledge\, 2017). She is currently writing The Last Outlaws\, a legal history of Australia’s last proclaimed outlaws\, the brothers Jimmy and Joe Governor. Her research on the journeys and legacies of European émigré lawyers in Australia is part of a collaborative research project with Eloise Chandler\, Sara Dehm and Ana Vrdoljak.\n\n \nThursday 7 March 2024\, 6-7.30pm AEDT\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus\n\nCPD Points: 1.5\n\nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-european-emigre-legal-scholars-in-australian-law-schools-julius-stones-circle/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231123T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231123T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235447Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010744Z
UID:1586-1700762400-1700767800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Bringing law back in: Theorizing the role of law in shaping the social reproduction bargain
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar | Bringing law back in: Theorizing the role of law in shaping the social reproduction bargain\nIn-person event \nA rich interdisciplinary feminist project spanning the fields of critical political economy\, feminist economics\, geography\, migration\, sociology and social policy has long sought to theorize and make visible the role social of reproduction and reproductive labour in sustaining both life and labour power\, and its transformations\, ‘depletions’ and ‘crises’ in post-Fordist life. With some notable exceptions\, however\, much of the intensive feminist attention upon social reproduction has taken place outside of legal scholarship. This might be attributed to several general factors: a dearth of materialist-informed approaches in feminist legal theory\, legal feminists’ liberal orientations towards work\, and a greater focus on unpaid care in the family\, rather than paid reproductive labours performed in the market. In addition\, non-legal disciplines have\, for their part\, been routinely less concerned with the role of law in their accounts of social reproduction\, leaving the role of law in shaping the social reproduction bargain undertheorized. \nThis seminar paper maps a legal feminist approach to social reproduction theory. In doing so\, it articulates the constitutive and distributional role of law in shaping markets in reproductive labours\, focusing specifically on paid care and domestic work. Attention to law is important because when we focus on law’s distributional and disciplinary outcomes we can begin to imagine how different legal rules might shape them otherwise. \nAbout the speaker:\nAngela Kintominas \nAngela Kintominas is a lecturer at the Faculty of Law and Justice\, UNSW Sydney where she teaches labour law. Her research interests lie in feminist and critical approaches to work\, gender\, migration and social reproduction. She is particularly interested in the intersection between social security/welfare state law\, labour law and migration law in producing gender (and other) inequalities. Her research has focused on forms of gendered\, informal and reproductive labour including care and domestic work\, au pairing and surrogacy\, as well as the platformization of care and domestic work in the gig economy\, family migration and transnational family life\, and the human and labour rights of migrant workers. \n  \nThursday 23 November 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEDT\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-bringing-law-back-in-theorizing-the-role-of-law-in-shaping-the-social-reproduction-bargain/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231102T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231102T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235516Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010746Z
UID:1595-1698948000-1698953400@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | The law and ethics of a property rights approach to frozen embryo disputes
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: The law and ethics of a property rights approach to frozen embryo disputes\nIn-person event \nDisputes over frozen embryos represent a particularly problematic case\, legally and ethically\, due to the ambiguity of their moral and legal status and the potential rights-claims which can be made with regard to them. Recent work has contextualised frozen embryos as liminal and suggested a contextual approach to their legal classification. \nBy appeal to personal property law\, with a lens provided by Roman law doctrines\, and reproductive bioethics\, we argue that frozen embryos may be subjects of property rights\, providing a more stable framework for dispute resolution. To illustrate how a property approach would work\, we reconsider the facts of the influential Evans case and argue that if a proprietary rather than promissory estoppel claim had been pursued\, the reverse outcome may have been reached\, to the benefit of women who are disproportionately harmed in these scenarios. \nAbout the speaker:\nTeresa Baron \nTeresa is a Nottingham Research Fellow working on reproductive ethics and philosophy of parenthood. She was previously a postdoc at the Czech Academy of Sciences\, and a visiting research fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna and the Jagiellonian University in Krakow. \nThursday 2 November 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEDT\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-the-law-and-ethics-of-a-property-rights-approach-to-frozen-embryo-disputes/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231019T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231019T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235547Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010744Z
UID:1606-1697738400-1697743800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Contract law and reasons for action: A crash course in private law theory
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar | Contract law and reasons for action: A crash course in private law theory\nIn-person event \nIf contract law is to be authoritative\, it must mediate between the subjects of contract law and reasons for action they have. Either implicitly or explicitly\, this insight informs various approaches to the theorisation of this law. Some have tried to understand contract law as mediating ordinary moral reasons relating to promising. Others have argued that this law embodies duties of private right\, the sort of reasons that apply to us as independent individuals cooperating as equals. And there are others still who identify different sets of reasons for action special to the contractual relationship. \nIn my talk\, I will identify the common flaw shared by these different theories. I will explain why focusing our attention on contract law as an exercise of political authority—rather than authoritative in the abstract—paves the way not only to a better understanding of the normative basis for contract but also the broad stakes involved in the making of contract law. \nAbout the speaker:\nDr Arie Rosen \nArie Rosen is a legal theorist based at the University of Auckland Faculty of Law and a founding co-director of the New Zealand Centre for Legal and Political Theory. His work in legal and political philosophy focuses on political authority\, the grounds for its exercise\, the ideology that sustains it\, and the impact it has on law and practical reasoning. His work appears in various edited volumes and leading journals\, including Legal Theory\, the Oxford Journal of Legal Studies\, the University of Toronto Law Journal\, and the Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. His current project focuses on how political authority is exercised in the context of private law and what this can teach us about constitutional structures and the core commitments of liberal political morality. \nThursday 19 October 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-contract-law-and-reasons-for-action-a-crash-course-in-private-law-theory/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231012T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231012T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235535Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010743Z
UID:1604-1697133600-1697139000@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Bathroom Bills and Liberal Rights
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Bathroom Bills and Liberal Rights\nIn-person event \nOn June 30th 2023 Florida’s House Bill 1521 came into effect. The bill requires that all trans people must use Florida public restrooms that align with the sex they were assigned at birth. This includes restrooms in all Florida airports\, government buildings\, schools and universities\, city parks and beaches\, and many Florida stadiums\, rest stops\, service stations\, and conferences. The implications of this bill are that all trans women\, for instance\, must use the men’s bathroom in these places even if they have had sex reassignment surgery\, have lived as a woman for decades\, or since they were a child\, are perceived to be a woman by everyone they meet\, and/or have changed their birth certificate\, their driving license\, and their passports so that they acknowledge that they are female or a woman. \nEarlier in 2023\, Kansas adopted a similar bathroom bill\, North Carolina adopted a similar bill in 2016-2017\, the UK government is considering adopting a similar law\, and at least 21 other US states have proposed similar bathroom bills. There has been a lot of discussion and criticism of these bathroom bills but no sustained case for their injustice (or their justice) has been made. This paper argues that bathroom bills like Florida’s breach trans people’s rights in three ways. I argue that we have the following three rights: (1) rights to not be made to subject ourselves to significant risks of harm in order to participate in the (face-to-face) public or social world; (2) rights to not be unjustly discriminated against; (3) rights to have our interests considered equally in lawmaking and policymaking. \nI argue that a variety of more specific liberal and egalitarian rights and claims\, made by a variety of liberals and egalitarians\, imply (1-3) and (1-3) are very intuitive. And I argue that bathroom bills like Florida’s breach trans people’s rights to (1-3). I argue that bathroom bills force trans people to risk significant harm in order to participate in the public or social world\, and refraining from adopting bathroom bills does not force anyone to incur any similar significant risk of harm to participate in the public or social world. I argue that the different philosophical theories of unjust discrimination that we have imply that bathroom bills are instances of unjust discrimination. And I argue that the adoption of bathroom bills does not involve equal consideration of trans people’s interests. \nAbout the speaker:\nAssociate Professor Rach Cosker-Rowland \nRach Cosker-Rowland is an Associate Professor in Moral and Political Philosophy at the University of Leeds. She is the author of The Normative and the Evaluative (OUP\, 2019) and Moral Disagreement (Routledge\, 2020) as well as the co-editor of Fittingness (OUP\, 2022). She has recently published papers on the nature of gender\, the relationship between gender identity and gender\, and gender-identity-based rights in journals including Nous\, Analysis\, and the Journal of Medical Ethics. Before taking up her position at Leeds she held positions at the Australian Catholic University\, La Trobe University\, the University of Oxford\, and the University of Warwick. \nThursday 12 October 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-bathroom-bills-and-liberal-rights/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231005T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20231005T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235548Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010744Z
UID:1607-1696528800-1696534200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Demystifying CLS: A reflection on writing an intellectual history of the Critical Legal Studies Movement
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar | Demystifying CLS: A reflection on writing an intellectual history of the Critical Legal Studies Movement\nIn-person event \nIn his forthcoming book The Rise and Fall of Critical Legal Studies\, Stewart uses the tools of CLS to analyse CLS\, assessing its dominant narrative against its history and legacy. Literary and philosophical lenses are used to highlight the power of CLS\, which in turn presents its deficits. In this seminar Stewart presents this rise and fall through key discoveries in his research\, as well as anecdotes from the Crits\, and why CLS was not as radical as it should have been. \nAbout the speaker:\nDr James Gilchrist Stewart \nJames is a lecturer in law and LLB Program Manager at RMIT’s graduate school of business and law. James has published on legal theory\, neoliberalism’s effect on law\, and is a media voice on Australian consumer law. James’ first book “The Rise and Fall of Critical Legal Studies” is scheduled for publication with Edinburgh University Press in 2024. \nThursday 5 October 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-demystifying-cls-a-reflection-on-writing-an-intellectual-history-of-the-critical-legal-studies-movement/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230914T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230914T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235604Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010744Z
UID:1612-1694714400-1694719800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Beyond Indigenous Cultural & Intellectual Property: opportunities in law reform for Aboriginal-led medicines in Australia and the limitations of legal pluralism
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar | Beyond Indigenous Cultural & Intellectual Property: opportunities in law reform for Aboriginal-led medicines in Australia and the limitations of legal pluralism\nIn-person event \nAustralian regulators and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples have the opportunity to co-design a cross-jurisdictional framework that ensures structural integrity and cultural ethics\, which embodies international law principles and standards. However\, the Australian intellectual property regime and regulatory framework for traditional medicines is not fit for purpose. Equally\, the tension between Australia’s settler state and unceded Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples remains constrained by legal pluralism\, western concepts of Indigeneity and biocultural knowledge and truth-telling. \nAbout the speaker:\nDr Virginia Marshall \nDr Marshall is a Research Fellow based at the Australian National University’s School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet). She is a practising lawyer and leading legal scholar with expertise in Aboriginal water rights\, native title rights in Sea Country\, Indigenous governance and the intersection of Traditional Knowledge systems and western intellectual property regimes\, especially as it relates to Indigenous commercialisation of traditional medicines. \nVirginia holds various government appointments including serving on the Climate Change Authority Board\, Deputy Co-Chair of the Committee on Aboriginal Water Interests and the Drafting Group for the National Water Initiative Mark 2 and regularly invited on expert roundtables relating to water policy reform. Virginia serves on the ANU Human Ethics Research Committee\, the inaugural Māori Research and Ethics Council and Chair of the ANU Indigenous Research Advisory Group. Virginia is a Co-Chair of the ANU Institute for Climate\, Energy & Disaster Solutions Indigenous peoples\, cultures and knowledges research cluster and is a Research Associate and Board member of ANU’s Australian Studies Institute. \n  \nThursday 14 September 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-beyond-indigenous-cultural-intellectual-property-opportunities-in-law-reform-for-aboriginal-led-medicines-in-australia-and-the-limitations-of-legal-pluralism/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230829T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230829T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235715Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010755Z
UID:1619-1693332000-1693337400@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:Julius Stone Address: What is political progress?
DESCRIPTION:Julius Stone Address: What is political progress?\nIn-person event\n  \nProgress is both a necessary and a dangerous idea. It is necessary if one is striving to improve the way things are\, and it is dangerous because the pursuit of progress has historically often given rise to episodes of paternalism\, colonial domination and narratives of civilizational superiority. In my talk\, I will present some first thoughts on how to defend a more critical account of progress. I will start by distinguishing between moral and political progress\, then explore the relation between political progress and justice. I will suggest that we make political progress not when we approximate an ideal of justice that is always already known to us\, but when the political institutions we construct reflect what we learn from the trials and failures of the past. \nAbout the speaker\nProfessor Lea Ypi \nLea Ypi is Professor in Political Theory at the London School of Economics and Political Science and an Honorary Professor in Philosophy at the Australian National University. A native of Albania\, she has degrees in Philosophy and in Literature from the University of Rome La Sapienza\, a PhD from the European University Institute and was a Post-Doctoral Prize Research Fellow at Nuffield College\, Oxford University. She is the author of Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency\, The Meaning of Partisanship (with Jonathan White)\, and The Architectonic of Reason. Her latest book\, a philosophical memoir entitled Free: Coming of Age at the End of History\, won the 2022 Royal Society of Literature Ondaatje Prize and the Slightly Foxed First Biography Prize and is being translated into more than twenty languages. Her academic work has been recognised with the British Academy Prize for Excellence in Political Science and the Leverhulme Prize for Outstanding Research Achievement. She coedits The Journal of Political Philosophy and occasionally writes for The Guardian. \n  \nTuesday 29 August\, 2023\nTime: 6-7.30pm \nVenue: Lecture Theatre 101\, Level 1\, New Law Building Annex (F10A) \n  \nThis event is hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. \nThe Julius Stone Address is generously sponsored by the Educational Heritage Foundation. It is named to commemorate the life and work of Professor Julius Stone\, Australia’s foremost legal philosopher and for many years Challis Professor of International Law and Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/julius-stone-address-what-is-political-progress/
LOCATION:Lecture Theatre 101\, level 1\, New Law Building F10A\, Campderdown Campus
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230810T173000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230810T190000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235714Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010812Z
UID:1618-1691688600-1691694000@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:The Life and Death of States: Author Meets Readers
DESCRIPTION:The Life and Death of States: Author Meets Readers\nIn-person event \nNatasha Wheatley’s bold new book The Life and Death of States: Central Europe and the Transformation of Modern Sovereignty (Princeton University Press 2023) rediscovers the multinational Habsburg polity as a hothouse for ideas that still shape our understanding of the sovereign state. The radical mismatch between theories of singular sovereignty and the empire’s plural\, layered legal order pushed politicians as well as scholars like Hans Kelsen toward bold new conceptions of the state and the nature of law. The book follows a recurring set of questions about the juridical birth\, death\, and survival of states through the creative experiments of Austro-Hungarian constitutional order and into the domain of international law following the empire’s collapse in 1918. These ideas would echo around the globe in the era of global decolonization that followed the Second World War\, suggesting new ways of understanding Central Europe in the world. \nAbout the speakers\n\nNatasha Wheatley is an historian of modern European and international history\, with broad interests in intellectual and legal history\, Central Europe\, and the history of international law. She was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Sydney before joining the Princeton faculty as an assistant professor in 2017. She is the co-editor of the volumes Power and Time and Remaking Central Europe\, and her writing has appeared in Past & Present\, History and Theory\, Law and History Review\, and the London Review of Books\, among other places. The Life and Death of States is her first book.\nProfessor Lisa Ford is the prize-winning author of three monographs: Settler Sovereignty: Jurisdiction and Indigenous People in America and Australia\, 1788-1836 (Harvard UP\, 2010); Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law\, 1800-1850 (Harvard UP\, 2016)\, co-authored with Professor Lauren Benton; and The King’s Peace: Law and Order in the British Empire (Harvard UP\, 2021). She recently co-edited The Cambridge Legal History of Australia (Cambridge UP\, 2022). Her current project\, on emergency in the British Empire is funded by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship.\nProfessor Lea Ypi is Professor in Political Theory at the London School of Economics and Political Science and an Honorary Professor in Philosophy at the Australian National University. A native of Albania\, she has degrees in Philosophy and in Literature from the University of Rome La Sapienza\, a PhD from the European University Institute and was a Post-Doctoral Prize Research Fellow at Nuffield College\, Oxford University. She is the author of Global Justice and Avant-Garde Political Agency\, The Meaning of Partisanship (with Jonathan White)\, and The Architectonic of Reason. Her latest book\, a philosophical memoir entitled Free: Coming of Age at the End of History\, won the 2022 Royal Society of Literature Ondaatje Prize and the Slightly Foxed First Biography Prize and is being translated into more than twenty languages. Her academic work has been recognised with the British Academy Prize for Excellence in Political Science and the Leverhulme Prize for Outstanding Research Achievement. She coedits The Journal of Political Philosophy and occasionally writes for The Guardian.\n\n——————————— \nThursday 10 August 2023\nTime: 5.30-7pm \nVenue: University of Sydney\, Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown \nThis event is being held in-person at Sydney Law School. \n——————————— \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute at the University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/the-life-and-death-of-states-author-meets-readers/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230727T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230727T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235727Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010747Z
UID:1621-1690480800-1690486200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Epistemic privilege and duties of mutual assistance
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Epistemic privilege and duties of mutual assistance\nIn-person event \nVictims of oppression are sometimes said to have epistemic privilege in virtue of their marginalised social position into the operation and impact of oppressive social structures. Epistemic privilege sometimes is cited as a basis for deference in social relations between victims and non-victims—for example\, the use of ‘lived experience’ to resolve or terminate disagreements about social and political oppression. I am interested in whether epistemic privilege can be a basis for duties of mutual assistance between victims\, where assistance is understood as mitigating the harms of oppression on other victims without necessarily targeting oppression itself. I outline the ways in which victims of oppression can be said to have epistemic privilege\, the limits of this privilege\, and what duties of assistance this privilege might ground. \nAbout the speaker:\nAshwini Vasanthakumar \nAshwini Vasanthakumar is a political and legal theorist with research interests in political obligation and authority\, migration\, and the ethics of resistance. \nShe is currently an Associate Professor and Queen’s National Scholar in Legal & Political Philosophy at Queen’s Law School in Canada. She holds an AB from Harvard\, an MA from Toronto\, a JD from Yale Law School\, and a DPhil from Oxford\, where she studied as a Canadian Rhodes Scholar. \nPreviously\, she has worked at King’s College London\, the University of York\, University College\, Oxford\, and Jindal Global Law School. She has also been a Researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies (Stockholm) and a Visiting Fellow at the Centre for Fundamental Rights at the Hertie School (Berlin). \n  \nThursday 27 July 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-epistemic-privilege-and-duties-of-mutual-assistance/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230720T110000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230720T130000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235728Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010754Z
UID:1622-1689850800-1689858000@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Workshop: Description and evaluation in contemporary jurisprudence
DESCRIPTION:JSI Workshop: Description and evaluation in contemporary jurisprudence\nIn-person event \nModern jurisprudence has been tormented by a divide between description and evaluation in legal theory. Proponents argue that the distinction is essential to any clearheaded discussion of law itself and its relation to adjacent normative systems\, especially morality. Opponents insist that being the necessarily normative practice it is\, a pure description of the law and its theory is untenable. This conversation will bring together legal and moral theorists to shed some novel light on an old problem. \nSpeakers \n\nAssociate Professor Kevin Walton (University of Sydney Law School)\nDr. Yarran Hominh (Assistant Professor in Philosophy\, Bard College)\nDr. Alma Diamond (Postdoctoral Fellow in Law & Philosophy\, University of Chicago)\nDr. Meir Yarom (Postdoctoral Fellow in Jurisprudence\, the Julius Stone Institute\, University of Sydney Law School)\n\n——————————— \nThursday 20 July\, 2023\nTime: 11am-1pm  \nVenue: Level 4\, Board Room\, New Law Building (F10) \nCPD Points: 2 \n———————————- \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-workshop-description-and-evaluation-in-contemporary-jurisprudence/
LOCATION:Board Room\, Level 4
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230713T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230713T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235742Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010752Z
UID:1625-1689271200-1689276600@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: The stability of bad things
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: The stability of bad things\nIn-person event\n  \nPolitical philosophers have long been concerned with how best to ensure the stability of social orders. Stability is assumed to be a good\, whether because whatever is good is better for being stably so\, or because stability enables cooperation in the pursuit of whatever other goods we have. \nBut is stability always a good? What of the stability of systems of unfreedom\, of forms of oppression and domination? Such systems are stable in the face of constant efforts to shift them. Why is this? Call this the question of the stability of bad things: why bad things are stable despite the fact that they are bad. \nIn this talk\, I examine one central way in which systems of unfreedom are self-stabilizing: through shaping the moral psychology of agents within those systems. Unfreedom is not just a matter of having limited options for choice\, but of the ways in which social systems foster in us particular ways of thinking\, feeling\, and acting. I argue that there are two ways in which this moral psychological shaping stabilizes systems of unfreedom. First\, it generates support for those systems\, by which I mean not just voluntary upholding of the system but a range of attitudes from consent to resigned participation. Second\, it disrupts possibilities of collective resistance to those systems. Understanding these mechanisms of stability might better help us to first resist\, and then transform\, the systems of unfreedom to which we are all subject. \nAbout the speaker:\nYarran Hominh \nYarran Hominh is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Bard College. His research sits at the intersection of social and political philosophy with moral psychology. He draws liberally from a variety of traditions of thought and practice\, including the pragmatist tradition\, the Black radical tradition\, Buddhist modernism\, and anti-racist\, anti-colonial\, and anti-imperial praxis from around the globe. He is working on a book entitled The Problem of Unfreedom and has papers recently published or forthcoming in Philosophers’ Imprint\, The Pluralist\, the Journal of Legal Philosophy\, Comparative Philosophy and the Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture. He is also the Associate Editor of the APA Studies on Asian and Asian American Philosophers and Philosophies and is on the editorial board of The Philosopher. \n  \nThursday 13 July 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-the-stability-of-bad-things/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230627T140000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230627T160000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235744Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010753Z
UID:1627-1687874400-1687881600@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Workshop | Towards a Moralisation of Jurisprudence? Reflections on the Future of Legal Philosophy
DESCRIPTION:JSI Workshop | Towards a Moralisation of Jurisprudence? Reflections on the Future of Legal Philosophy\nIn-person event\nThere is a trend in current Anglo-American legal philosophy that is drawing the attention of legal scholars. We could label this trend “The moralisation of jurisprudence”. Its animating idea is as follows: The questions still left open in contemporary jurisprudence can only be addressed by moral theory. Thus\, there is no longer room for legal philosophy as an autonomous field of enquiry. The seminar aims to critically discuss this thesis from different theoretical perspectives. \nAbout the speakers:\nProfessor Damiano Canale \nDamiano Canale is Professor of Philosophy of Law and Critical Thinking at Bocconi University\, Milan (Italy). His scholarship mainly focuses on legal reasoning and legal interpretation\, the methodology of jurisprudence\, the relationship between scientific knowledge and legal knowledge\, and the history of legal concepts. He was visiting fellow at the Max-Plank-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte (Frankfurt a.M.)\, the Yale Law School and the University of Oxford. He is the author of four books in Italian and his papers have been published in journals such as Law and Philosophy\, Ratio Juris\, the American Journal of Law and Jurisprudence\, the Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence\, Jurisprudence\, Informal Logic\, Argumentation. \nDr Meir Yarom \nMeir Yarom is the inaugural Julius Stone Postdoctoral Fellow. He has recently completed his PhD entitled ‘Reflections on Coherence in Law’ supervised by Jeremy Waldron at NYU School of Law. \nTuesday\, 27 June 2023 2.00 – 4.00pm AEST\nVenue:  Board Room\, Level 4\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-workshop-towards-a-moralisation-of-jurisprudence-reflections-on-the-future-of-legal-philosophy/
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230615T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230615T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235746Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010746Z
UID:1629-1686852000-1686857400@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar | Legalizing Assisted Dying: Are We On A Slippery Slope To Involuntary Euthanasia?
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Legalizing Assisted Dying: Are We On A Slippery Slope To Involuntary Euthanasia?\nIn-person event\n  \nOn 28 November 2023\, the Voluntary Assisted Dying Act will come into effect in NSW. The Act allows ill persons having decision-making capacity\, acting voluntary\, and with less than six months to live (12 months in the case of a neurogenerative illness) to request a prescription of a lethal substance to end intolerable suffering. If the medical practitioners responsible for the assessment of the request confirm that the eligibility conditions are satisfied\, the patient may decide to self-administer the lethal substance or that the substance is to be administered to the patient by a doctor. The Voluntary Assisted Dying Act was eventually approved on 19 May 2022 after an exhausting and hard-fought parliamentary debate. \nOne of the main reasons justifying the opposition to the bill was provided by a slippery slope argument: The legalization of assisted dying would be a first and decisive step towards the gradual acceptance by public opinion\, medical professions\, and political decision-makers of the medical killing of people unable to consent. Given that this outcome is morally disgraceful\, assisted dying should not be permitted in the first place. Slippery slope arguments are popular in a wide range of debates across bioethics\, law\, and public policy\, and are still extensively used to prevent the legalization of assisted dying in countries such as the UK\, Germany and Italy. Besides\, they are widely employed to prevent policymakers from extending the right to assisted dying to new categories of persons in those jurisdictions where that right is already recognized. \nHowever\, it is highly disputed whether arguments of this sort are able to support their conclusions or should rather be dismissed because ill-grounded. In this seminar I will try to answer this question. To do that\, I will first show that various versions of the slippery slope arguments are actually present in the debate on assisted dying. I will then claim that the only version of the argument that is not ill-grounded supports the opposite conclusion\, namely that the non-recognition of the right to assisted dying may be a first step on the slippery slope to unvoluntary euthanasia in many legal systems. \nAbout the speaker:\nDamiano Canale \nDamiano Canale is Professor of Philosophy of Law and Critical Thinking at Bocconi University\, Milan (Italy). His scholarship mainly focuses on legal reasoning and legal interpretation\, the methodology of jurisprudence\, the relationship between scientific knowledge and legal knowledge\, and the history of legal concepts. He was visiting fellow at the Max-Plank-Institut für Europäische Rechtsgeschichte (Frankfurt a.M.)\, the Yale Law School and the University of Oxford. He is the author of four books in Italian and his papers have been published in journals such as Law and Philosophy\, Ratio Juris\, the American Journal of Law and Jurisprudence\, the Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence\, Jurisprudence\, Informal Logic\, Argumentation. \n  \nThursday 15 June 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is proudly presented by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-legalizing-assisted-dying-are-we-on-a-slippery-slope-to-involuntary-euthanasia/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230523T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230523T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235850Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010747Z
UID:1648-1684864800-1684870200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Crowdsourcing and artificial intelligence in constitutional courts
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Crowdsourcing and artificial intelligence in constitutional courts\nIn-person event\nIn Judgment SU-151/2020 the Constitutional Court of Colombia rendered its decision on a constitutional complaint of a group of journalists. They claim that in certain criminal cases concerning possible corruption by government officials\, prosecutors and judges were unsatisfyingly prohibiting the press to attend public criminal law hearings. The petitioners claimed that judges and prosecutors use to limit the constitutional right to free press outside of those exceptions and by means of disproportionate decisions. \nThe Court made an open call to journalists\, prosecutors\, judges\, and other interested parties to send short videos or writings with relevant information or their views concerning the issue at hand. The Court received 37 videos and writings. All materials were posted online\, and people wrote comments on them. The Court was able to process those materials\, which reveal that there was indeed and unconstitutional practice. However\, the Court could have never processed that information\, had it received hundreds or thousands of pieces of information. \nThis example illustrates how crowdsourcing can assist constitutional courts to overcome their epistemic deficiencies for solving constitutional cases. Those deficiencies can relate to factual or normative matters. Nevertheless\, this advantage does not come without risks. Judicial crowdsourcing can be meaningless if it is misused as a mechanism of democratic window-dressing. This risk instantiates if\, as it may happen with other mechanisms of digital democracy\, it is entirely shaped and controlled by representatives of “existing entrenched social and economic interests” or if constitutional procedural laws include an empowerment for judges to disregard or supersede outcomes of crowdsourcing processes without justification. Furthermore\, power brokers can manipulate crowdsourcing mechanisms. Additionally\, judicial crowdsourcing can be trivialized if citizens’ suggestions do not elicit deliberation among judges and remain only as an expression lacking any kind of impact. Finally\, constitutional courts can use artificial intelligence to analyse big amounts of information that stake-holders submit in the crowdsourcing process. The use of artificial intelligence for those purposes also raises specific concerns of algocratia\, opacity\, and algorithmic discrimination. \nWithin the context\, the aim of this presentation is to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the use of crowdsourcing and artificial intelligence by Constitutional Courts in complex cases of constitutional adjudication. \nAbout the speaker:\nCarlos Bernal \nCarlos Bernal is Commissioner of the Inter-American Human Rights Commission. He is professor of law at the University of Dayton (Ohio\, USA) and Macquarie University (Sydney\, Australia). Between 2017 and 2020\, he was Justice at the Colombian Constitutional Court. His qualifications include a LL.B. from the University Externado of Colombia (Bogotá – Colombia) (1996)\, a S.J.D. from the University of Salamanca (Spain) (2001)\, and a M.A. (2008) and a Ph.D. in Philosophy (2011) from the University of Florida (U.S.A). \nProf. Bernal’s research focuses on constitutional rights’ interpretation\, comparative constitutional change\, general jurisprudence -in particular\, on the intersection between social ontology and legal theory-\, and the philosophical foundations of tort law. His work has been published in high-ranked peer-reviewed journals\, books and edited collections in English\, Spanish\, German\, Italian\, French\, Portuguese\, and Russian. \n  \nTuesday 23 May 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-crowdsourcing-and-artificial-intelligence-in-constitutional-courts/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230511T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230511T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235849Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010752Z
UID:1647-1683828000-1683833400@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: The life of international law is not logic but experience
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: The life of international law is not logic but experience\nIn-person event\n  \nU.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously maintained that “the life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience.” Holmes statement suggests an antecedent question: what is the life of the law? This essay construes this question ontologically. What gives law life? What animates it\, and in so doing warrants the claim that law contributes to the production of social order in a particular community? \nThe answer\, I contend\, is that law lives\, or exists\, only in those societies where law rules\, and law rules only when the exercise of political power is conducted under the supervision of lawyers\, agents for whom realizing the rule of law is a calling or vocation. Perhaps surprisingly\, I contend that the most prominent proponent of this account of law in the field of international law and legal theory is Martti Koskenniemi. While he generally eschews talk of government in accordance with the rule of law in favor of “a culture of formalism” and “constitutionalism as a mindset\,” I demonstrate that Koskenniemi defends the same conception of law that Lon Fuller and Ronald Dworkin do. This conception identifies law not with rules or institutions but with a particular approach to the exercise of political power\, one premised on actors reciprocal regard for one another as autonomous and responsible agents. \nRead the paper here. \nAbout the speaker:\nDavid Lefkowitz \nDavid Lefkowitz is Professor of Philosophy and the founding Coordinator of the Program in Philosophy\, Politics\, Economics\, and Law (PPEL) at the University of Richmond (US). His scholarship focuses largely on conceptual and normative questions in international law\, and the morality of obedience and disobedience to law. He is the author of Philosophy and International Law: A Critical Introduction (CUP 2020)\, as well as more than forty journal articles and book chapters. Lefkowitz has held research fellowships at Princeton University\, the U.S. Naval Academy\, and National University of Singapore\, and served as a visiting research scholar at Pompeu Fabra University. \n  \nThursday 11 May 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is co-hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence and the Sydney Centre for International Law at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-the-life-of-international-law-is-not-logic-but-experience/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230420T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20230420T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235900Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010751Z
UID:1655-1682013600-1682019000@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Politics all the way down? A qualified defence of critical legal theory
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Politics all the way down? A qualified defence of critical legal theory\nIn-person event\n  \nIn this talk\, Dr Ntina Tzouvala sets out to defend the potential for legal theory of what Edward Said called ‘contrapuntal reading’\, Louis Althusser (drawing from Jacques Lacan) described as ‘symptomatic read-ing’\, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick denounced as ‘paranoid reading’. Albeit different in their origins and orientation\, all three approaches demand that we take law seriously\, but not literally. They suggest that legal texts neither are nor can be made complete and coherent and they presume that nobody is in full control of those text\, perhaps least of all their authors. \nDr Tzouvala argues that this ‘hermeneutics of suspicion’ (Ricoeur\, 1970) establishes the specificity of (critical) legal theory as opposed to both doctrinal work that strives for consistency and to a particular form of legal history and legal biography that place the conscious plans\, desires and ideas of the individual subject at the centre of the law. Importantly\, this approach does not simply defer to ‘politics’ for the validity for its arguments but posits that symptomatic reading is the only way to establish rigorous knowledge of the law as an autonomous subject. \nAbout the speaker:\nDr Ntina Tzouvala \nDr Ntina Tzouvala’s work focuses on the political economy\, history and theory of international law. She is especially interested in historical materialism\, deconstruction\, feminist and queer legal theory. Her first monograph\, Capitalism as Civilisation: A History of International Law\, was published by Cambridge University Press in late 2020. Her book was awarded the 2022 ASIL Certificate of Merit for a preeminent contribution to creative scholarship and the Australian Legal Research Award (ALRA) in the book category. In addition\, it was shortlisted for the Deutscher Prize and was awarded a honourable mention in the context of the 2021 Sussex Prize in International Theory. Her work has also appeared in leading journals\, including the European Journal of International Law\, the Leiden Journal of International Law and the Journal of International Economic Law. \nBetween 2019 and 2021 Ntina was a founding member of the editorial collective of the Third World Approaches to International Law Review. In early 2020\, she was appointed Senior Advisor to the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food. \n\nThursday 20 April 2023\, 6-7.30pm AEDT\nVenue: Level 4\, Common Room\, New Law Building (F10)\, Eastern Avenue\, Camperdown campus \n  \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is co-hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence and the Sydney Centre for International Law at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-politics-all-the-way-down-a-qualified-defence-of-critical-legal-theory/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20221208T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20221208T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235952Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010754Z
UID:1684-1670522400-1670527800@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:Julius Stone Address: The Legal Experience of Injustice
DESCRIPTION:Julius Stone Address: The Legal Experience of Injustice\nIn-person event \nIn The Faces of Injustice\, Judith Shklar criticizes the ‘normal model’ of justice which views injustice as ‘a prelude to or a rejection and breakdown of justice\, as if injustice were a surprising abnormality’. Her central insight is that ‘the real realm of injustice … does not stand outside of the gates of even the best known of states. Most injustices occur continuously within the framework of an established polity with an operative system of law in normal times.’ She also offers a second\, Hobbesian insight: ‘[w]ithout juridical institutions and the beliefs that support them\, there can be no decent\, just\, or stable social relations\, but only anxiety\, mutual mistrust\, and insecurity’. Since juridical institutions and the beliefs that support them may be necessary for justice\, but insufficient to prevent injustice\, the insights are perfectly consistent as a matter of abstract logic. \nMy question is consistency as a matter of a different logic\, the logic of legal experience for those in the ‘jural community’\, the community of persons subject to law. I argue that such experience shows that certain kinds of injustice are inconsistent with an operative system of law since they create tensions within the jural community that it must resolve to remain operative. I rely on two of Shklar’s examples\, the Nazi state and slavery in USA\, and two she did not mention\, the apartheid state and the ‘parallel state’ of Israel and the Occupied Territories\, to show how systems of law offer a legal resource that makes resistance to certain kinds of injustice possible and thus the practice of human rights lawyering. However\, at the same time we see that all involved in maintaining an operative system of law\, including human rights lawyers and their clients\, participate in legitimizing the system. Here I suggest that Shklar underestimated the ability of the legal theories of three important exemplars of the normal model of justice\, H.L.A. Hart\, Lon Fuller and Ronald Dworkin\, to illuminate different aspects of the experience of injustice. \n>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> \nThursday 8 December\, 6-7.30pm\nCPD points =1.5 \n>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> \nAbout the speaker\nProfessor David Dyzenhaus \nDavid Dyzenhaus is a professor of Law and Philosophy at the University of Toronto\, a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada and a Corresponding Fellow of the British Academy. He holds the Albert Abel Chair of Law and was appointed in 2015 to the rank of University Professor. He has taught in South Africa\, England\, Canada\, Singapore\, New Zealand\, Hungary\, Mexico and the USA. He holds a doctorate from Oxford University and law and undergraduate degrees from the University of the Witwatersrand\, South Africa. In 2002\, he was the Law Foundation Visiting Fellow in the Faculty of Law\, University of Auckland. In 2005-06 he was Herbert Smith Visiting Professor in the Cambridge Law Faculty and a Senior Scholar of Pembroke College\, Cambridge. In 2014-15\, he was the Arthur Goodhart Visiting Professor in Legal Science in Cambridge. In 2016-17\, he was a Fellow of the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin. In 2020-21\, he was a Guggenheim Fellow and a Visiting Fellow of All Souls College\, Oxford. \nProfessor Dyzenhaus is the author of Hard Cases in Wicked Legal Systems: South African Law in the Perspective of Legal Philosophy (now in its second edition)\, Legality and Legitimacy: Carl Schmitt\, Hans Kelsen\, and Hermann Heller in Weimar\, and Judging the Judges\, Judging Ourselves: Truth\, Reconciliation and the Apartheid Legal Order. He has edited and co-edited several collections of essays. In 2004 he gave the JC Smuts Memorial Lectures to the Faculty of Law\, Cambridge University. These were published by Cambridge University Press in 2006 as The Constitution of Law: Legality in a Time of Emergency. He is editor of the University of Toronto Law Journal and co-editor of the series Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law. His most recent book is The Long Arc of Legality: Hobbes\, Kelsen\, Hart (Cambridge\, 2022). \n  \nContact \nPlease contact Dr Kevin Walton (kevin.walton@sydney.edu.au) with enquiries about the conference. \n  \nThis event is hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. \nThe Julius Stone Address is generously sponsored by the Educational Heritage Foundation. It is named to commemorate the life and work of Professor Julius Stone\, Australia’s foremost legal philosopher and for many years Challis Professor of International Law and Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney.
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/julius-stone-address-the-legal-experience-of-injustice/
LOCATION:Camperdown Campus – venue to be confirmed
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/png:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/JS-Address-banner-image-cICtkH.tmp_.png
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20221124T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20221124T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240912T235954Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010750Z
UID:1686-1669312800-1669318200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Lawmativity
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Lawmativity\nHybrid event\n  \nExplaining the normativity of law – how it guides action by giving reasons – is one of the central questions of general jurisprudence. It is also one of the topics on which there is least agreement. In the first half of the talk\, Alex Horne offers a diagnosis as to why. Basically: the desiderata for a genuine and mutually satisfactory solution to the problem of law’s normativity cannot all be satisfied by one theory. In the second half of the talk\, he articulates his partial solution to the problem and explains (i) which desiderata we should abandon and (ii) why the best – and complete – account of law’s normativity is therefore piecemeal. \nAbout the speaker:\nAlex Horne is a PhD candidate at the University of Cambridge. He works on various topics in moral psychology\, ethics\, political philosophy\, and jurisprudence. \n\nThursday 24 November 2022\, 6-7.30pm AEDT\nThis event is being held an online and in-person at Sydney Law School. Please indicate your viewing preference when registering. \n  \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-lawmativity/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20220915T180000
DTEND;TZID=Australia/Sydney:20220915T193000
DTSTAMP:20260413T063403
CREATED:20240913T000035Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240913T010747Z
UID:1706-1663264800-1663270200@law-events.sydney.edu.au
SUMMARY:JSI Seminar: Children\, families\, and immigration enforcement
DESCRIPTION:JSI Seminar: Children\, families\, and immigration enforcement\nSpeaker: Associate Professor Matthew Lister\, Bond University \nWhat might otherwise seem like straight-forward instances of immigration enforcement can give rise to both practical and moral complications when the objects of the enforcement measures are children and/or have close family ties to citizens or legal permanent residents. In the case of children\, we may doubt whether they can be held morally responsible for immigration violations and may also face complicated questions about the best interest of the children. \nWhen an otherwise removable non-citizen has close family ties to a citizen or permanent resident\, we may worry that removal will both impose disproportionate harms on the one removed and will also cause unacceptable harms on\, and violate the rights of\, citizens or permanent residents. \nIn this seminar\, Matthew Lister will try to isolate the issues\, both practical and moral\, and look at what sorts of limits they place on otherwise acceptable instances of immigration enforcement. \nAbout the speaker:\nMatthew Lister is an Associate Professor at Bond University. He is a legal and political philosopher as well as a lawyer who works on normative issues relating to immigration and refugee law\, international law\, including international economic law and regulation\, workplace and employment law\, criminal law\, and other issues in jurisprudence and political philosophy. \n  \nThursday 15 September 2022\, 6-7.30pm AEST\nThis event is being held an online and in-person at Sydney Law School. Please indicate your viewing preference when registering. \n  \nCPD Points: 1.5 \n  \nThis event is hosted by the Julius Stone Institute of Jurisprudence at The University of Sydney Law School. 
URL:https://law-events.sydney.edu.au/event/jsi-seminar-children-families-and-immigration-enforcement/
LOCATION:Common Room\, Level 4\, Sydney Law School
CATEGORIES:CPD eligible events,Jurisprudence events
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR